Malaysia

[UPDATED] Govt fails bid to strike out Indira Gandhi’s RM100 mil suit

Mother sues authorities for delays in finding her youngest child taken by ex-husband

Updated 4 years ago · Published on 07 Sep 2022 12:49PM

[UPDATED] Govt fails bid to strike out Indira Gandhi’s RM100 mil suit
M. Indira Gandhi sues the government and the police for RM100 million in a civil suit for delays in recovering her child, Prasana Diksa, who was taken away and converted into Islam by her ex-husband, Muhammad Riduan Abdullah. – The Vibes file pic, September 7, 2022

by Amar Shah Mohsen

KUALA LUMPUR – M. Indira Gandhi’s RM100 million civil suit against the police and government will now proceed after the latter failed in their appeal to strike out her nonfeasance suit. 

A three-member Court of Appeal panel found that the government’s application was without merit and ordered for the case to be remitted back to the high court, where it will undergo trial over the authorities’ failure to locate her youngest daughter despite a court order.

Case management has been set for September 14. 

Indira Gandhi filed the suit in October 2020 following protracted delays by the police to recover the child, Prasana Diksa, from her ex-husband, Muhammad Riduan Abdullah, who unilaterally converted the couple’s children to Islam.

In her suit, she named the inspector-general of the Royal Malaysian Police, the Home Ministry, and the government as defendants – claiming the authorities had deliberately and negligently ignored a previous mandamus order from the Federal Court to probe and take appropriate action to locate and return Prasana.

Riduan, formerly known as K. Patmanathan before his conversion to Islam in 2009, had reportedly abducted Prasana when she was 11 months old. She is 14 years old this year. 

Appeals court judge Datuk Hanipah Farikullah, in dismissing the government’s appeal today, said the complexity of the issue required a full hearing while ordering RM10,000 in costs to be paid to Indira Gandhi. 

Other than Hanipah, who chaired the panel, the other judges presiding over the case were Datuk Gunalan Muniandy and Datuk Ahmad Zaidi Ibrahim. 

Indira Gandhi was represented by Rajesh Nagarajan and Sachpreetraj Singh Sohanpal from Raj & Sach Associates. 

In a virtual press conference after the decision was delivered, Indira Gandhi said the delayed action by the police is a poor reflection of the force, adding that the lack of updates she has received pertaining to Prasana was very depressing. 

She also took the current Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Acryl Sani Abdullah Sani to task for his inaction and silence over the case, insisting he should address a matter of public interest. 

Meanwhile, Indira Gandhi Action Team chairman Arun Dorasamy said it is saddening that the case had to go through an exhausting legal process against the police, whose solemn duty was to protect every citizen. 

“We don’t even know what has happened to Prasana. We really hope she is alive and well.

“We have no way of knowing. Whatever the conspiracy and justification for the police’s lack of action is, Indira Gandhi deserves justice.”

He added that the high court had previously set February 5 to February 9, 2024, for the trial. 

Today’s court decision is the second time the government has failed in its bid to strike out Indira Gandhi’s suit.

On July 16 last year, the high court similarly dismissed the government’s application.

Indira Gandhi and Riduan married on April 10, 1993, and have three children — the other two being Tevi Darsiny, 23, and Karan Dinish, 22. 

In 2009, Riduan unilaterally converted their kids to Islam and obtained custody of them from the Ipoh shariah court.

Indira Gandhi then filed an application for full custody of the children, which was granted by the Ipoh High Court in March 2010, although Prasana was forcibly taken by Riduan. The couple divorced on August 8, 2012. 

Despite an arrest warrant for Riduan issued by the high court in 2014, police have yet to locate him. He was last believed to be living in a neighbouring country. 

In 2018, the Federal Court ruled that the unilateral conversion of the three children to Islam was invalid in a landmark decision. – The Vibes, September 7, 2022

Related News

Community / 4d

Mother’s 30-minute wait for mall lift highlights plight of parents with strollers

Malaysia / 2w

Year One pupil found dead at apartment complex

Malaysia / 1mth

Irene Sofiya had wanted to become a doctor like her late mother

Malaysia / 1mth

No ventilator, no sleep: Doctor recalls keeping critically ill baby alive on helicopter (video)

Malaysia / 3mth

Mother: ‘The lives of my kids matter more than any VIP’

Malaysia / 3mth

Mother, two daughters found dead in Ipoh house

Spotlight

Opinion

Can Najib break Madani?

World

Trump offers UFC CEO the position of Press Secretary

Malaysia

Building a great nation begins with happy families, says Anwar

Malaysia

Anwar should sack BN ministers who are not aligned with him – Muhyiddin

Malaysia

AGC rejects claims of defying King’s decree on Najib

Malaysia

Deepavali: Selangor Sultan calls on Malaysians to strengthen unity, reject hatred

Malaysia

If there were still obstacles, why accept the RM50m payment, asks Najib’s daughter

Malaysia

Where did UMNO's RM50 million payment for Najib's release come from?

By The Vibes Says

You may be interested

Malaysia

Iran defends two-day proposal to resume peace talks

Malaysia

6.3-magnitude earthquake strikes near Solomon Islands

Malaysia

Foreign suspect held within 24 hours over fatal stabbing of elderly man in Sabah

Malaysia

Health Ministry probes food poisoning complaints involving Gardenia bread and Twiggies

Malaysia

PM announces additional aid of RM2,500 for each flood victim in Selangor

Malaysia

Malaysian man with two criminal records held in Brunei’s record 102kg drug bust

Malaysia

Monsoon surge puts 12 Kelantan and Terengganu districts under severe rain warning

Malaysia

Malaysia must reduce reliance on foreign workers through automation, robotics, says Johari